Everstate is an imaginary state in our contemporary world of the beginning of the 21st century created to identify and imagine various futures. It will be used to represent all states and each state. Everstate is thus an ideal-type state and a shorthand for the model that was constructed to represent the dynamics and processes underlying the evolution of a state, as political form, a dynamic map or network, as will be explained in detail this week in a second and third post.
However, even if we work with an ideal-type, events do not unfold in a vacuum but are dependent and constrained by a host of specific factors, most notably geography, the ecological milieu and history.
Thus to make our foresight at once realistic, replicable, as well as adaptable to specific, existing countries, some criteria need to be initially identified and then specified, i.e. we shall give them values for Everstate. For example, if geography is selected as a criteria, then you may give as value: land in the tropical belt in South Asia, or land in Northern America, then determine if your country is small or large, etc. Those initial characteristics will also influence what happens. To identify which criteria we need, we shall use a “revisited influence analysis“ that will be posted on 4 December. Then, we shall explain how to attribute values for each criterion, in the specific case of dynamic networks, on 18 December, as well as post those selected criteria and their values.
We shall then explain how we shall proceed with the map to construct the narrative through use of ego networks, and apply it immediately to articulate how those values set the stage for Everstate. For the New Year – posting on Monday 2 January as an exception, we shall thus start really telling the story of Everstate, while, in the meantime, showing how to do it.
You can imagine changing those criteria to see if the stories change, to get potential futures that are closer to those countries that interest you or apply real criteria to identify plausible futures for real countries.
Pingback: 2013 – 2018 EVT – Learning from Water Privatization? (Panglossy) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2013 – 2018 EVT – Increasing wages: not enough, too late? (Panglossy) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2013 – 2018 EVT – Unforeseen Outrage: the Air Revolt (Panglossy) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2013 – 2018 EVT – Investing for Green Growth without Liquidity (2) (Panglossy) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2012-2013 EVT – Restoring Growth (Panglossy) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2012 EVT – New Government, New Opposition, Last Hope (Panglossy) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2018 – 2023 EVT – A Polity in Shambles (Mamominarch) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2018 – 2023 EVT – Escalation (Mamominarch) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2013 – 2018 EVT – Shrinking the Income of the Nation (Mamominarch) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2013 – 2018 EVT – A Current Account Surplus? Think again! (Mamominarch) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: Featured Images, Symbols & Foresight Product: the Example of The Chronicles of Everstate | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2012 EVT – Scenario 1 – Mamominarch: Off with the State | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2012-2013 EVT – Implementing the Mamominarch conclusions | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2012 EVT: Ideological Stakes in an Outdated Worldview (The Chronicles of Everstate) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2012 EVT: Budget Deficit and Liquidity (The Chronicles of Everstate) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2012 EVT: Seeking Security (The Chronicles of Everstate) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: 2012 EVT: Rising Discontent (The Chronicles of Everstate) | Red (team) Analysis
Pingback: Everstate: Setting the stage (II) | Red (team) Analysis